In the 1860s the U.S. and Russia each finalized
their emancipation. Despite taking the next step towards equality and freedom
their paths were on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. While reading I was
curious to learn of how Russia dealt with their emancipated the serfs as
compared to how America dealt with the end of slavery. American history is
clear, we all learned at a young age the steps that were taken after emancipation,
the rules, regulations, and stipulations made to not only prohibit African
Americans from healthy development but also to prohibit Native Americans, Mexicans,
and women. Since the time period and circumstances of Russia are exceptionally comparable,
but how did Russia differ?
Land was the most fundamental aspect of Russian
society, “The goal, as throughout much of Russian history, was to match up land
and people in productive ways, on terms that pleased the ruler” (Burbank and
Cooper, 281). The emancipation of the surfs was displeasing to the nobles and
peasants alike in Russia; unlike the U.S. it did not involve a civil war or
very much violence to invoke the new policy. Serfs were granted the same rights
as peasants granting them administrative and judicial rights as well house hold
plots and allotments of land to be held and managed collectively. Overall
Russia handled the emancipation of the serfs much more gracefully and
thoughtfully compared to America. They even compensated former masters for the
debt they had accumulated due to the end of serfdom. The ex-serfs were even
given a nearly fifty year deadline to repay the state for the land they
acquired after emancipation. Russia seemed to take every step to ensure that
all lived comfortably after such a large demographic change that affected their
entire society, but why? Why did the Russians go to such great lengths for “undeserving”
serfs?
Russia’s autocratic system was favorable to their “Reform
from above” system allowing elites to have almost complete control of the
system and do as they pleased, America’s republican system would not have
allowed this. Another factor that prohibited a smooth American transformation
was the constitution, in order for major changes occur it had to be approved by
many and then amended officially before it could be put into effect. Russians
used the impermanent allocation of rights and resources. The largest barrier
was race. The multiplicity of people was not a problem in Russia and since
there was not dominant race there was no issue with Slav serfs. We clearly
cannot say the same for America who did not provide the same freedoms and safe
havens to slave descendants until sadly, the 1960s.
Race simply
changed the entire dynamic for both countries. Russia did not wish to form a
separation between the “dominant” race as opposed to the lesser one, probably
because they truly did have a lesser race. They had for a long time appreciated
and welcomed racial diversity, America had yet to get over that hurdle thus
causing the civil war and inequality for non-Anglo-Saxon peoples. Russia and America began the road to freedom
around the same time but sadly arrived at the finish line of equality in two
different centuries.
Russia went to such lengths for the purpose of a controlled and stable empire. The cost of allowing a confederacy of diverse religious and ethnic groups is their independence. Successful conversion to imperial intermediaries allows the czar dominion over large groups of peoples.
ReplyDeleteRussia presents a decent to better opportunity of life in exchange for not an assimilation of the Russian culture, but a conformed/mimicry of Russian culture, so as long as "both rights and groups were kept in play by Russia's imperial leaders," Burbank and Cooper (273).