One of the most interesting points from this week’s reading,
for me, was covered on pages 186 through 188. In the section, authors Burbank and
Cooper discuss a “familiar strategy to consolidate power,”—which they identify
as—establishing a state religion.
At first, the Rus’ believed in many gods; they were
polytheistic. Comparable to the Romans, they frequently brought in the various deities
of other cultures and religions to make them their own. Then, the greatest Rus’
leader, Vladimir, started to like monotheism. And we can assume, converting from
many gods to one god is a pretty significant, maybe even unusual, switch. According
to “Russian chronicles,” out of the monotheistic religions, Vladimir decided on
monogamous Christianity either because “reasons of state must have prevailed…or
perhaps alcohol trumped sex.”
Afterwards, the people were baptized, and although the
Slavic population continued in polytheism, this newly adopted Christianity
transformed the ruling city of the Rus’ and their culture. Unfortunately, the
section concludes that “religion was not enough to sustain empire-building by
the Rus’,” but I think that the concept is a very interesting one.
Although the Roman empire began with in the same way—polytheistic
turned monotheistic Christianity—did it really consolidate power in the way it was
temporarily successful for the Rus’? Was that the reason behind declaring
Christianity the imperial religion? I also wonder if it really happened the way
the Russian chronicles state. Was Christianity the only option because Judaism
was the religion of a defeated people and Islam outlawed alcohol?
For some reason I guess, as a practicing historian, I hope
that there was more to it than that. Maybe in the long run, it doesn’t matter
why Christianity was chosen over Judaism or Islam or even that the Rus’
switched from polytheism to monotheism. And looking at figures like King Henry
VIII of England, who began the Church of England because of his desire to dissolve
one of his many marriages, I guess it’s possible that a decision concerning
religion could be made in such a way. But I’d like to think that there was more
to Vladimir’s decision. Where imperial
decisions only made based on the imperial consequences? Was everything done for
the benefit of the empire, with complete ignorance to morality?
No comments:
Post a Comment